Peer Reviewers
The following academics, researchers, and professionals contribute to the peer-review process of Jurnal Garasi Buku dan Obrolan Keilmuan (SIBOOK Journal). Reviewers are selected based on their academic expertise, relevant scholarly or professional experience, and suitability to the subject of the submitted manuscript.
SIBOOK Journal applies a double-blind peer-review process. Reviewer assignments are made according to subject expertise, availability, and the absence of relevant conflicts of interest. The identity of reviewers assigned to individual manuscripts is kept confidential in accordance with the journal's peer-review policy.
| Full Name | Institutional Affiliation | Country | Academic Profiles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rahmat Hidayat | Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Putra Galuh | Indonesia | Google Scholar | SINTA |
| Shilphy Afiattresna Octavia | Kantor Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Ciamis | Indonesia | — |
| Asep Saepuloh | Kantor Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Ciamis | Indonesia | — |
| Edy Chandra | Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati Cirebon | Indonesia | Google Scholar |
| Edy Suroso | Universitas Siliwangi | Indonesia | — |
| Nengsih | Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa | Indonesia | — |
| Rabi’ah | STAI Rasyidiyah Khalidiyah Amuntai | Indonesia | — |
| Rahmat Aziz | Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang | Indonesia | Google Scholar | ORCID | Scopus |
| Opik Taupik Kurahman | Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung | Indonesia | Google Scholar | ORCID | Scopus | SINTA |
| Tiska Febrial | Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri 1 Kerinci | Indonesia | — |
| Ahmad | Uma Lengge Mengajar Community | Indonesia | — |
Reviewer Responsibilities
Peer reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, confidential, and substantive evaluations of manuscripts within their areas of expertise. Reviews should address, where applicable, the originality and scholarly contribution of the manuscript, research methodology, quality of analysis, interpretation of findings, relevance of references, research ethics, and the clarity of the scholarly argument.
Reviewers must disclose any potential conflict of interest and decline a review assignment when they are unable to provide an independent and impartial assessment.
Detailed responsibilities and ethical requirements for reviewers are available in the Reviewer Guidelines .
