Analisis Reflektif Evaluasi Diri Guru Madrasah dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Berbasis Temuan Tantangan dan Implikasi Pendampingan

Yasiman Yasiman; Dodo

doi:10.62475/sibook.v3i2.31

Authors

Yasiman Yasiman Kantor Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Ciamis Author
Dodo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62475/sibook.v3i2.31

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the results of teachers’ self-reflective evaluation in the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum by highlighting achievements, challenges, and mentoring needs. A descriptive qualitative design was employed, with primary data derived from the July teachers’ self-evaluation instrument covering five main aspects: lesson planning, teaching implementation, learning assessment, student guidance, and additional tasks. The findings indicate that most teachers achieved the “target met” category, particularly in planning and student guidance, although a considerable proportion reported “partially implemented” in teaching and assessment. The main challenges include limited ICT resources, low students’ basic literacy, dense learning materials with restricted time allocation, and heavy administrative workload. These findings suggest that teacher reflection is not merely an administrative formality, but an early diagnostic tool that effectively maps teachers’ actual needs. Theoretically, this study contributes by reinforcing the concept of periodic reflection as a strategy for improving teaching quality, while practically it provides recommendations for contextual mentoring by school principals and supervisors. The implications highlight the importance of fostering a reflective, collaborative, and adaptive culture in madrasahs to support the success of the Merdeka Curriculum, with the limitation that classroom observations were not conducted for data triangulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 (Evaluation and Assessment)

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 (SCIRP)

Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000208994 (people.bath.ac.uk)

Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2018). Classroom assessment, pedagogy and learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. –

Langelaan, B. N., Gaikhorst, L., Smets, W., & Oostdam, R. J. (2024). Differentiating instruction: Understanding the key elements. Teaching and Teacher Education, 140, Article 104464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104464

Levatino, A., et al. (2024). Unveiling teachers’ work preferences: A conjoint analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education. –

Ruiz-Gallardo, J. R., et al. (2011). Assessing student workload in PBL. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.001

Myllykoski-Laine, S., Parpala, A., Hailikari, T., & Postareff, L. (2024). Using self-reflection to support higher education teaching. Reflective Practice, 25(5), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2376784

Burhan-Horasanlı, E., & Orta, E. (2024). Empowering teachers via reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education. –

Gelfuso, A., & Dennis, D. V. (2016). A framework for facilitating video-mediated reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education. –

Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education. –

Spiteri, D. (2025). Reflecting on pre-service teachers’ journals. Reflective Practice, 31(1), 1–18. DOI belum tersedia (belum dipublikasikan at time)

Tobin, B., et al. (2024). Collaborative conversations and reflection for impact. Professional Development in Education. –

Hobson, A. J. (2024). The role of mentoring programme coordinator. Professional Development in Education. –

Glover, A., & Woolley, S. (2024). Effective mentoring in teacher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. –

Salo, P., et al. (2024). Understanding professional learning in and for practice. Professional Development in Education. –

Elek, C., & Page, J. (2024). Theoretical foundations of coaching as PD. Professional Development in Education. –

Nadeem, M., et al. (2024). Distributed leadership in educational contexts. International Journal of Educational Research Open. –

Hossain, K. I., et al. (2024). The role of culture in English language learning (review). International Journal of Educational Research Open. –

Baca, E. C., & Hall, S. (2024). Teaching in two-way dual-language-bilingual education. International Multilingual Research Journal. –

Heine, S., et al. (2024). Preservice teachers’ professional knowledge for ICT integration. Education and Information Technologies. –

Consoli, T., et al. (2024). Quality of technology integration matters. Education and Information Technologies. –

Díaz, P., et al. (2024). How teacher students used digital response systems. Education and Information Technologies. –

Schiller, R., et al. (2024). Automated feedback for scientific argument writing. Computers & Education. –

Timmers, C. F., Walraven, A., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2015). Regulation feedback in computer-based formative assessment. Computers & Education, 87, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.012

Maier, U., et al. (2016). Computer-assisted formative assessment with diagnostic items. Computers & Education. –

Hooshyar, D., et al. (2016). Game-based formative assessment for programming. Computers & Education. –

Atjonen, P., et al. (2024). Pre-service teachers as learners of formative assessment. European Journal of Teacher Education. –

Hopfenbeck, T. N., et al. (2024). Bridging the gap: From assessment theory to classroom reality. Assessment in Education. –

Wolterinck-Broekhuis, C. H. D., et al. (2024). Student perceptions of formative assessment policy. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. –

Vattøy, K. D., et al. (2025). Navigating formative assessment as change. Teacher Development, 29(2), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2024.2382956

Hwang, Y., & Lim, C. (2024). Instructional design principles for teachers’ ICT use. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(5), 1465–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09996-9

Kerman, N. T., et al. (2024). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis. Education and Information Technologies. –

Ghamrawi, N., et al. (2024). Cultivating teacher leadership via PD. School Leadership & Management. –

Rexigel, E., et al. (2024). Multiple external representations in STEM (systematic review & meta-analysis). Educational Psychology Review. –

Wang, S., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: SLR. Expert Systems with Applications. –

Ariza, J. Á., et al. (2025). Interventions/strategies in STEM/STEAM for students with disabilities (SLR). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. –

Pastore, S., et al. (2024). Institutionalising formative assessment through school reform. Cogent Education. –

Compen, B., et al. (2025). Good practices for differentiated instruction (action research). International Journal of Inclusive Education. –

Kupers, E., et al. (2024). Teachers’ intentions to differentiate (TPB vs. SDT). European Journal of Special Needs Education. –